Rising anti-Israel sentiment: Charlie Kirk’s letter to Netanyahu exposes the battle for Gen Z’s hearts and minds

• Kirk, a prominent conservative activist, described himself as a “surrogate” for Israel in private correspondence with Benjamin Netanyahu.
• Kirk warned Netanyahu that Israel was losing the “information war” and needed to counter rising anti-Israel sentiment, especially among Gen Z.
• Netanyahu praised Kirk for his efforts to counter anti-Israel narratives and disagreed with claims that Israel was involved in his assassination.
• Kirk was assassinated during a speech at Utah Valley University in September 2025; his killer faces the death penalty.
• The debate over Kirk’s stance on Israel highlights ideological fractures within conservative ranks, with figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene increasingly critical of Israeli actions.

The untimely death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has stirred a wave of intense debate, particularly regarding his close ties with Israel and the Israeli government. In a May 2 letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, now revealed, Kirk described himself as a “surrogate” for Israel, a revelation that has sparked controversy and shed light on the complex relationship between American conservatism and Israeli interests. This case not only highlights the growing anti-Israel sentiment in the U.S. but also underscores a critical moment for conservative solidarity.

Charlie Kirk’s role in countering anti-Israel sentiment

Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was known for his passionate advocacy on college campuses. In his letter to Netanyahu, Kirk expressed his deep love for Israel and emphasized the need for Israel to address rising anti-Israel sentiment, particularly among Generation Z. He outlined seven key strategies to counter misinformation and win the “information war,” including the promotion of daily life in Israel and leveraging social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter). Kirk urged Netanyahu not to subcontract rhetorical defenses to American surrogates but to step up and take direct action. “Israel is losing the information war and needs a ‘communications intervention,'” Kirk wrote, highlighting the urgency of the situation.

The assassination and its consequences

On September 10, Charlie Kirk was assassinated during a speech at Utah Valley University, an event that shocked the nation and reignited debates about his ties to Israel. Netanyahu dismissed any claims of Israeli involvement in Kirk’s assassination, calling it a “monstrous big lie.” Meanwhile, details about Kirk’s relationship with Israel’s leaders have come to light, revealing that he was often at odds with Netanyahu’s policies, particularly regarding the conflict in Gaza. Despite this, Kirk remained a staunch supporter of Israel, as evidenced by his extensive letter. His death has left a significant void in conservative activism, and his advocacy strategies may well influence future efforts to address global and domestic issues.

Emerging rifts within American conservatism

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has not only spotlighted his relationship with Israel but also illuminated the widening ideological rifts within American conservatism. Figures like Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene have shared their views on Kirk’s relationship with Israel, with some acknowledging his criticisms of Netanyahu’s policies while others emphasized his dedication to the Jewish state. This internal debate underscores the challenges faced by conservative leaders in balancing support for Israel with the emerging anti-Israel sentiment among younger generations. The case of Charlie Kirk serves as a critical reminder of the delicate balance between ideological dedication and public perception.

The lasting impact of Charlie Kirk’s legacy

Charlie Kirk’s legacy extends beyond his activism and into the broader discourse on conservatism and foreign policy. His letter to Netanyahu, though intended to bolster Israeli efforts, has instead opened a Pandora’s box of questions and criticisms. While his advocacy for Israel and Judeo-Christian values remains a point of contention, it is clear that his strategies for countering anti-Israel sentiment have left a significant mark. As the conservative movement navigates internal divisions and changing public opinion, the lessons from Kirk’s activism and his final letter to Netanyahu will undoubtedly be revisited and reinterpreted. His tragic death has not only shone a light on the complexities of modern conservatism but has also underscored the importance of open dialogue and critical thinking in addressing global challenges.

Sources for this article includes:

InformationLiberation.com

NYPost.com

Newsweek.com